In-depth review Aiberm By hu-qian · Shenzhen Last tested May 22, 2026 4 min read

Aiberm Review 2026: Best AI Token Relay for Chinese Developers? — Multi-provider API access beyond Claude/GPT

Aiberm in-depth review 2026: pricing, model coverage, China availability, uptime, and developer experience. Is it worth it?

Composite score
56.4/ 100
Reviewed. Multi-provider API access beyond Claude/GPT
Security3/5 A
Uptime94%
PriceFree / PAYG
Model coverage2 models
China accessLimited
Payment支付宝 · 微信支付

The 30-second summary

+ What we liked

  • Broad model support: Kimi, MiniMax, DeepSeek, GLM, Grok
  • Operator has multiple proven projects
  • Stable operation on most channels

What we didn't

  • Claude pricing at ~2x official — not the cheapest
  • Limited differentiation from competitors
  • No standout feature for Claude users

In-depth review

Overview

Aiberm positions itself as a multi-provider API relay station that goes beyond the usual Claude/GPT offerings. While the headline models are GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, the real value proposition here is the breadth of Chinese domestic models available through a single endpoint. If you’re a developer in China looking to avoid juggling multiple API keys and payment systems, Aiberm deserves a look—with some important caveats.

Models and API Compatibility

The supported model list is genuinely broad for a relay service:

  • Western models: GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • Chinese models: Kimi, MiniMax, DeepSeek, GLM (智谱), Grok

This is a solid lineup for developers who need to test or deploy across multiple providers without managing separate accounts. The API is OpenAI-compatible, so you can drop in the base URL and API key into most existing tooling (OpenAI SDK, LangChain, etc.) with minimal config changes.

The max token limit of 100,000 is reasonable for most use cases, though heavy document processing might push against that ceiling.

China Access and Performance

Aiberm works without VPN in mainland China. In my testing, connection was stable on most channels, but the 94% uptime figure is notably lower than competitors who claim 99%+. Occasional timeouts during peak hours are worth factoring in for production workloads.

The operator has several proven projects in the Chinese AI ecosystem, which lends some credibility—this isn’t a fly-by-night operation. However, the service lacks a clear differentiator. It’s functional but doesn’t offer anything that makes you say “I need to switch to this right now.”

Pricing

ModelAiberm PricingOfficial Pricing (Reference)
GPT-4oStandard market rate~$5/1M input tokens
Claude 3.5 Sonnet~2x official pricing$3/1M input tokens
DeepSeekCompetitive~$0.5/1M input tokens
GLM / KimiMarket rateVaries by provider

There’s no free trial, so you’re paying from day one. The Claude pricing at roughly double the official rate is the biggest pain point. If Claude is your primary model, you’ll feel the premium. The Chinese models are priced more reasonably, making Aiberm more attractive if you’re mixing DeepSeek or GLM into your workflows.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Broad model support including Kimi, MiniMax, DeepSeek, GLM, and Grok
  • Operator has multiple proven projects with decent track record
  • Stable operation on most channels for day-to-day use

Cons

  • Claude pricing at ~2x official rate—not the cheapest option
  • Limited differentiation from other relay services
  • No standout feature specifically for Claude users
  • 94% uptime is below industry average for relay services

Verdict

Aiberm is a decent multi-provider relay that makes sense if you need access to a wide range of Chinese models alongside GPT-4o. The operator’s track record and the breadth of domestic model support are genuine strengths.

However, the premium Claude pricing, lack of a free trial, and sub-95% uptime make it hard to recommend as a primary relay for production workloads. If DeepSeek or GLM are your main models, it’s worth considering. If you’re primarily using Claude, look elsewhere—the 2x markup isn’t justified by the service quality.

Rating: 3/5 — Functional but unremarkable. Good for multi-model experimentation, not ideal for Claude-heavy production.

FAQ

Q: Does Aiberm require a VPN to use in China? A: No, Aiberm is accessible without VPN from mainland China. The relay handles the connection to upstream providers, so you only need internet access to their API endpoint.

Q: Is the API compatible with the OpenAI Python SDK? A: Yes, Aiberm uses an OpenAI-compatible API format. You can use the standard OpenAI SDK by changing the base_url and API key. Most LangChain and AutoGPT tooling will work with minimal configuration changes.

Q: Why is Claude 3.5 Sonnet priced at ~2x the official rate? A: This is a common markup for relay services that need to cover their infrastructure costs and provide China access without VPN. The premium is higher for Claude because of additional licensing and bandwidth costs. For cost-sensitive Claude workloads, this is a significant disadvantage compared to other relays.

Pricing breakdown

Aiberm offers competitive pricing for developers. Here's the breakdown:

PlanPriceQuotaBest for
Free$0/moLimitedKicking the tires
EnterpriseCustomSLA · dedicated supportTeams & agencies

Supported models

2 models across major vendors.

GPT-4o Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Frequently asked questions

Can I access this platform from China without a VPN?

Most relay stations are accessible from Chinese ISPs. Check our review for specific routing details.

What payment methods are accepted?

Payment options vary by platform. Some accept Alipay/WeChat Pay, others are USD/crypto only.

How does this compare to using OpenAI directly?

Relay stations add routing latency but provide access from restricted regions, unified billing, and multi-model fallback.

Is my API key safe?

Keys are encrypted at rest. Most platforms support per-project scoping and IP allow-lists.

Should you use Aiberm?

Multi-provider API access beyond Claude/GPT