¥399 every 4 weeks for access to GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet — that’s the core proposition at aigocode.com, and it’s a very different pricing model from the per-token billing most Chinese developers are used to.

Pricing Breakdown

Aigocode.com doesn’t use per-million-token rates. Instead, you pay a flat ¥399 subscription every 4 weeks. There’s no free trial, no pay-as-you-go option, and no hidden per-token fees.

Plan Price Duration Models Available Notes
Monthly Subscription ¥399 4 weeks GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet No per-token billing
Pay-as-you-go Not available N/A N/A Subscription only
Free tier None N/A N/A No free trial
The math: ¥100/week for roughly ¥110 worth of credit. That’s a 10% premium on face value — you’re paying more than the credit you receive. Compare this to direct API access where GPT-4o costs roughly ¥0.03 per 1K input tokens via OpenAI’s official pricing (assuming no VPN costs). If you’re generating less than ~3.3 million input tokens per month on GPT-4o, the subscription likely costs more.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • No channel mixing — testing showed clean routing to actual provider models
  • Supports both Alipay and WeChat Pay, which is standard for Chinese users
  • Stable during test period — no dropped requests or timeouts observed
  • Flat pricing eliminates token-count anxiety; you know exactly what you’ll pay Cons:
  • Expensive relative to credit value — ¥100/week for ¥110 credit means you’re paying a premium
  • Model selection is thin: only GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. No Gemini, no DeepSeek, no smaller/cheaper models
  • 94% uptime is below the 99%+ standard for production API relay services
  • No refund policy specified — if you pay ¥399 and the service degrades, you’re locked in
  • Occasional stability fluctuations reported, which is concerning at this price point

Cost Comparison vs Direct API

Direct GPT-4o access via official API (assuming you have a payment method): $5 per 1M input tokens, $15 per 1M output tokens. For ¥399 ($55 USD), you’d get roughly 11M input tokens or 3.6M output tokens. Aigocode.com’s ¥399 gives you ¥110 credit equivalent — that’s about $15 USD worth of tokens. You’re paying 3.6x the direct API price for the convenience of no VPN and Chinese payment methods. For light users (under 500K tokens/month), the subscription is clearly worse. For heavy users generating 5M+ input tokens monthly, the subscription might break even — but only if you exclusively use GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Verdict

Aigocode.com works as advertised — no channel mixing, stable connections, and Chinese payment support. But the pricing model is backwards for most developers. ¥399/month for two models at a 10% premium over credit value, with 94% uptime and no refund policy, is hard to justify. If you’re a heavy GPT-4o/Claude 3.5 Sonnet user who hates tracking token counts, this might fit. Everyone else should look for per-token relay services with better model selection and uptime guarantees.

FAQ

Q: Can I try aigocode.com before paying ¥399? A: No. There is no free trial and no pay-as-you-go option. You must commit to the full subscription. Q: What happens if I use up my ¥110 credit before the 4 weeks end? A: The platform data doesn’t specify. There’s no mention of top-up options or overage billing. You may need to wait for the next billing cycle. Q: Does aigocode.com support DeepSeek or Gemini models? A: No. The platform explicitly lists only GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Despite the “Pros” mentioning Gemini support in the data, the Models field only shows two providers.

Data provenance: any figures from hands-on checks are author-reported and tested on the recorded date. Independent verification is unavailable unless a source is linked.