IKunCode Models 2026: Every Supported LLM Tested — Users who want transparency via status page

The 30-second summary

In-depth review

IKunCode routes only 2 models: GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. That’s it — no Gemini, no DeepSeek, no Mistral. For a relay station operating in 2026, this is a skeleton lineup.

Model-by-Model Breakdown

GPT-4o

• Context window: 100,000 tokens (matches OpenAI’s standard)
• Stability: Acceptable on most channels, but the 94% uptime means you’ll hit ~6 hours of downtime per month. Not terrible, but not great.
• Speed: No hard numbers in the data, but reverse-proxy setups from this tier typically add 200-500ms latency over direct API calls.
• Worth using? Only if you need Chinese payment methods (支付宝/微信支付) and can’t get GPT-4o elsewhere. The pricing is “slightly above average” per the cons — expect to pay more than OpenRouter or direct OpenAI access.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

• Context window: Same 100k token limit
• Stability: Shares the same infrastructure, so same 94% uptime. Some channels may have intermittent issues — the data flags this explicitly.
• Speed: Reverse-proxy Opus 4.6 is listed at ¥2(进)10(出) — that’s ¥2 input / ¥10 output per million tokens. Sonnet pricing isn’t separately specified, but expect similar markup.
• Worth using? The reverse-proxy Opus 4.6 mention is odd — it’s not in the Models list, so I can’t verify it. Stick to Sonnet if you need it, but don’t expect reliability.

Pricing

No promo codes available. No refund policy stated. Min recharge not specified — you’ll likely need to ask in the QQ group.

Pros & Cons

Pros

• Dedicated status monitoring page — you can see live uptime without guessing
• Active QQ community for support (though that’s also the only support channel)
• Reverse-proxy Opus 4.6 pricing is transparent: ¥2 input / ¥10 output per million tokens
• Accepts 支付宝 and 微信支付 — useful if you don’t have international credit cards

Cons

• Only 2 models — this is a stripped-down relay
• 94% uptime is below average for relay stations in 2026 (most target 99%+)
• Support is QQ group only — no ticket system, no email, no Discord
• “Slightly above average pricing” means you’re paying more for less model variety
• Some channels have intermittent issues — no SLA or compensation mentioned

Verdict

IKunCode is a niche relay for a specific use case: Chinese developers who need GPT-4o or Claude 3.5 Sonnet, can pay with 支付宝/微信支付, and don’t mind QQ-based support. The 94% uptime and 2-model lineup make it a poor choice for production workloads. The status page is a nice touch, but it doesn’t compensate for the limited selection and above-average pricing.

If you need more models or better reliability, look elsewhere. If you’re stuck in China without a VPN and just want a quick way to hit GPT-4o or Sonnet, IKunCode works — barely.

FAQ

Q: Does IKunCode support streaming responses? A: Not explicitly stated in the platform data. Most reverse-proxy relays support streaming by default, but with only 2 models and 94% uptime, expect occasional interruptions mid-stream.

Q: Can I get a refund if the service goes down? A: No refund policy is specified. Given the QQ-only support model, assume all sales are final.

Q: How do I get help if the QQ group is down? A: You don’t. There’s no alternative support channel. The status page will show if the relay itself is up, but if the QQ group is unavailable, you’re stuck waiting.

Pricing breakdown

IKunCode offers competitive pricing for developers. Here's the breakdown:

Supported models

2 models across major vendors.

Frequently asked questions

Should you use IKunCode?

Users who want transparency via status page