接口AI Cheapest Plan 2026: Price Breakdown & Cost Calculator — Testing additional relay options

The 30-second summary

In-depth review

GPT-4o input costs $0 per million tokens on 接口AI’s free tier, but there’s a catch: the platform doesn’t disclose per-token rates for paid usage, and uptime sits at 94%.

Pricing Breakdown

接口AI operates as a free trial relay with no monthly subscription. The $0/month entry point means you can test GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 2.0 without upfront payment. However, the platform data lacks specific per-token or per-million-character pricing — a red flag for anyone comparing costs against direct API calls.

No batch discounts, no hidden fee disclosures, and no minimum recharge amount are published. Payment methods are limited to 支付宝 and 微信支付 — no international cards or crypto.

Cost Comparison vs Direct API

Direct OpenAI API pricing for GPT-4o is $2.50 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet runs $3 per million input, $15 per million output. Gemini 2.0 Flash is cheaper at $0.10/$0.40 per million.

接口AI’s free tier beats direct costs by $0, but the missing paid rates mean you can’t calculate whether post-trial pricing undercuts or exceeds direct API. The 94% uptime (Safety rating: 3/5) suggests reliability issues — direct API uptime typically exceeds 99.5%.

Free Tier Limitations

The free trial is active (free_trial: True), but max tokens are capped at 0 in the data — likely a data entry error or indicator of no explicit cap. Without published limits, assume rate throttling or request caps exist. Composite score of 56.4/100 reflects the lack of verified data.

Pros & Cons

Pros

• Zero-cost entry for testing three major models
• Chinese payment methods (支付宝, 微信支付) simplify onboarding for local developers
• API aggregation reduces need for multiple accounts

Cons

• No per-token pricing published — can’t compare costs post-trial
• 94% uptime is below industry standard for production workloads
• Small community footprint means fewer troubleshooting resources
• Limited independent verification of claimed model access

Verdict

接口AI works as a quick test bench for GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 2.0, but the missing pricing transparency kills it for serious cost comparison. The 94% uptime and 3/5 safety rating make it unsuitable for production deployments. If you need a free trial to evaluate relay quality, it’s worth a spin — just don’t build your pipeline on it.

For developers comparing costs, stick with direct API pricing tables until 接口AI publishes per-token rates. The free tier is the only concrete value here.

FAQ

Q: Is 接口AI completely free? A: The free trial is active, but no paid tier pricing is published. You can test GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 2.0 at $0/month initially.

Q: How does 接口AI’s pricing compare to direct OpenAI API? A: Direct GPT-4o costs $2.50/million input tokens. 接口AI’s post-trial rates are undisclosed, so a direct cost comparison isn’t possible.

Q: What payment methods does 接口AI accept? A: Only 支付宝 and 微信支付 — no credit cards or cryptocurrency.

Q: Can I use 接口AI for production workloads? A: Not recommended. 94% uptime and a 3/5 safety rating fall short of production requirements. The small community footprint also limits support options.

Q: Are there hidden fees or minimum deposits? A: No minimum recharge amount or hidden fees are specified in the platform data. However, the lack of published per-token rates makes it impossible to rule out future costs.

Pricing breakdown

接口AI offers competitive pricing for developers. Here's the breakdown:

Supported models

3 models across major vendors.

Frequently asked questions

Should you use 接口AI?

Testing additional relay options