Cubence vs OpenRouter: Price, Models, and API Access
Cubence is 30% more expensive than OpenRouter on Claude 3.5 Sonnet at 10M tokens/month, but it's faster — top 3 on the Claude speed leaderboard.
Cubence is 30% more expensive than OpenRouter on Claude 3.5 Sonnet at 10M tokens/month, but it's faster — top 3 on the Claude speed leaderboard.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet input costs $3 per million tokens on ClaudeCN, with output at $15 per million tokens — roughly 1.5x Anthropic’s direct API.
ClaudeCN routes exclusively to GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet with a max context of 100,000 tokens, but its 94% uptime sits below the industry.
2 models listed; Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o are the only options. Model Breakdown ClaudeCN is not a multi-model relay.
ClaudeCN is 100% more limited than OpenRouter on model selection — OpenRouter routes 200+ models while ClaudeCN offers exactly two — but.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet via CCFly runs ¥2300/month for a dedicated MAX carpool seat — that's more than the official API subscription. Pricing.
100% uptime and 514ms average latency from Chinese ISPs — CCFly makes a narrow bet that developers in China want one thing: reliable Claude.
CCFly lists exactly 2 models: GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. No Gemini, no DeepSeek, no Mistral. Best for developers needing a narrow catalog.
CCFly is 100% uptime vs OpenRouter’s reported 99.5% for Chinese traffic, but you pay ¥2300/month solo for Claude Code—OpenRouter’s Claude Sonnet.
GPT-4o input costs $0 per million tokens on BUZZ’s free trial. That’s the headline number, but the real question is what happens after the trial.