Security-ranked AI relay stations 2026. Scored on key management, HTTPS enforcement, public status pages, and operational transparency.
This page answers which relay station has the strongest security posture — ranked by real data from hu-qian.com methodology v3.2, re-scored every 30 days.
39 platforms compared. Last updated: 2026-05-23.
Security: 5/5 | Score: 99.9/100 | Uptime: 99.9%
The international multi-model gateway. Full model coverage with the newest releases, but charges official price + markup fee.
Why it ranks #1: Most comprehensive model selection; Transparent pricing with markup displayed
Full OpenRouter review Try OpenRouter
Security: 5/5 | Score: 99.5/100 | Uptime: 99.5%
One of the fastest-updating relay stations with the newest models — GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro. Active community and WeChat SDK.
Why it ranks #2: Fastest model updates — often within hours of official release; Public status page with real-time monitoring
Full AIHubMix review Try AIHubMix
Security: 5/5 | Score: 99.3/100 | Uptime: 99.3%
Global relay with 24 CN2 nodes worldwide — supports GPT-4, Claude 3, Gemini 2.5. Excellent for international users with Stripe/USDT payment.
Why it ranks #3: 24 CN2 global proxy nodes — fastest overseas routing; Stripe and USDT payment accepted
| Rank | Platform | Security | Score | Uptime | Free Trial | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenRouter | 5/5 | 99.9 | 99.9% | ✓ | → |
| 2 | AIHubMix | 5/5 | 99.5 | 99.5% | ✓ | → |
| 3 | N1N | 5/5 | 99.3 | 99.3% | ✓ | → |
| 4 | YUNWU API | 5/5 | 99.0 | 99.0% | ✓ | → |
| 5 | 素墨API | 5/5 | 98.0 | 98.0% | ✓ | → |
| 6 | V-API | 4/5 | 80.0 | 100.0% | ✓ | → |
| 7 | NekoCode | 4/5 | 78.4 | 98.0% | ✗ | → |
| 8 | PackyCode | 4/5 | 78.4 | 98.0% | ✓ | → |
| 9 | SSSAICode | 4/5 | 76.8 | 96.0% | ✗ | → |
| 10 | AI Tools | 4/5 | 76.0 | 95.0% | ✓ | → |
| 11 | BUZZ | 4/5 | 75.2 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 12 | CCFly | 4/5 | 75.2 | 94.0% | ✗ | → |
| 13 | ClaudeCN | 4/5 | 75.2 | 94.0% | ✗ | → |
| 14 | DawCode | 4/5 | 75.2 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 15 | DuckCoding | 4/5 | 75.2 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 16 | FastCode | 4/5 | 75.2 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 17 | aicodemirror | 4/5 | 75.2 | 94.0% | ✗ | → |
| 18 | 发现AI | 4/5 | 75.2 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 19 | 米醋AI | 4/5 | 75.2 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 20 | Cubence | 3/5 | 58.8 | 98.0% | ✗ | → |
| 21 | LinkAPI | 3/5 | 57.6 | 96.0% | ✗ | → |
| 22 | RightCode | 3/5 | 57.6 | 96.0% | ✓ | → |
| 23 | FoxCode | 3/5 | 57.0 | 95.0% | ✓ | → |
| 24 | Aiberm | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✗ | → |
| 25 | Chintao AI | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 26 | DoroAI | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 27 | Ekan8 | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✗ | → |
| 28 | IKunCode | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✗ | → |
| 29 | LingxiCode | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 30 | MNAPI | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 31 | Poixe AI | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 32 | SparkCode | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 33 | Terminal.Pub | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 34 | TimiCC | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 35 | ZeroCode | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 36 | aigocode.com | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✗ | → |
| 37 | 哈基米 | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 38 | 接口AI | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
| 39 | 神马AI | 3/5 | 56.4 | 94.0% | ✓ | → |
We score 5 factors: HTTPS enforcement, public status page, key isolation, operational history (months active), and incident response transparency.
Every 30 days via automated re-scoring. Latency from live monitor checks every 10 minutes.