LingxiCode Supported Models: Limits and API Coverage
LingxiCode lists 2 models; GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet are the only options. Model Breakdown: What You Get Two models.
LingxiCode lists 2 models; GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet are the only options. Model Breakdown: What You Get Two models.
LingxiCode undercuts OpenRouter by roughly 30% on Claude 3.5 Sonnet at 10M tokens/month, but you pay for it with 94% uptime and a 900ms latency.
IKunCode routes only 2 models: GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. That’s it — no Gemini, no DeepSeek, no Mistral. Best for developers needing a narrow catalog.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet through FoxCode costs roughly 40-60% less than direct Anthropic API pricing for Chinese developers, though exact per-million.
FoxCode lists 3 models; Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus are the workhorses here, with Haiku for lighter tasks. This relay is built for one.
FoxCode is roughly 30–40% cheaper than OpenRouter on Claude 3.5 Sonnet at 10M token volume , but it only routes three Claude models — zero GPT.
GPT-4o input costs $0 per million tokens on Ekan8 because the platform has no per-token pricing — it uses a recharge wallet model with no listed.
94% uptime and 900ms latency in 2026 means Ekan8 is not a platform you depend on for production—it's a casual-use relay if you want to test.
Ekan8 lists 2 models: GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. This isn't a platform for developers who need breadth. Best for developers needing a narrow catalog.
Ekan8 is 6.5x slower than OpenRouter for GPT-4o calls from Shanghai (900ms vs ~140ms), but costs about 40% less per token on Claude 3.5 Sonnet..