Sourcegraph Cody 2026: Free & Pro Discontinued — What Replaced It

Verdict: The Cody most people are searching for no longer exists. Sourcegraph discontinued Cody Free and Cody Pro on July 23, 2025 — new signups had already closed on June 25, 2025. What remains is Cody Enterprise, still supported and actively developed. If you arrived here looking for the $9/month plan, that price is historical, not current. Below: what closed, what Sourcegraph points you to instead, and who Enterprise is still for.

What Is Sourcegraph Cody?

Sourcegraph Cody is an AI-powered code assistant developed by Sourcegraph, a company specializing in code search and intelligence. Its core value proposition is providing code completions, edits, and answers that are context-aware of an entire codebase, not just the open file. This is built on Sourcegraph’s existing code graph technology. It integrates directly into major IDEs like VS Code and JetBrains suite, functioning as an extension.

A concrete use-case involves a developer joining a team with a large, unfamiliar monolithic repository. Instead of manually searching or asking colleagues, they can ask Cody natural language questions like, “How does the authentication middleware handle expired tokens?” or “Refactor this function to use our internal logging service.” Cody generates answers or code changes that reference relevant files and patterns from across the entire project, significantly reducing onboarding time and context-switching.

Sourcegraph Cody Plan Status 2026 — Free and Pro Are Gone

This is the part most pages still get wrong. Sourcegraph’s own blog post “Changes to Cody Free, Pro, and Enterprise Starter plans” states the Free and Pro tiers were retired on July 23, 2025; new signups were closed from June 25, 2025. Cody was also removed from the Enterprise Starter plan on the same date.

What the pricing page shows now: sourcegraph.com/pricing no longer lists Cody at all. It lists an Enterprise plan starting at $16K (annual minimum). If you need Cody today, the commercial path is Enterprise — a sales conversation, not a self-serve checkout.

Is there a free tier left? No. The Free tier named on older comparison pages does not exist any more.

Sourcegraph Cody vs GitHub Copilot vs Cursor — Price Comparison

Tabnine and Cursor entry prices are vendor-published list prices; confirm them on each vendor’s own pricing page. This table deliberately omits figures I could not verify against a vendor page.

Cody’s whole-repo context was genuinely the differentiator over Copilot’s file-scoped context — that comparison still holds technically. What changed is that you can no longer buy it as an individual. That reframes the decision: this is no longer “Cody vs Copilot for $9”, it is “do I qualify for an Enterprise contract”.

What Replaced Cody

Sourcegraph’s announcement directs affected Free and Pro users to Amp (ampcode.com) and credits the transition: $10 for former Free users, $40 for former Pro users.

Beyond that, treat claims with care. Statements circulating about Amp — that it spun out as an independent company in December 2025, that it uses pass-through pricing, that it has a $5 minimum top-up — appear in third-party write-ups, not in Sourcegraph’s own announcement. I am labelling those unverified rather than repeating them as fact.

Who Cody is still for: large, security-sensitive engineering organizations that need codebase-wide context inside their own deployment boundary — the exact profile Cody Enterprise was built for. If that is not you, the practical answer is to evaluate a currently-sold tool and treat Cody as a closing chapter, not a purchase option.

Key Features

Full Codebase Context Awareness This is the foundational feature cited in its top pros. Cody indexes and understands the relationships and patterns across all files in a connected repository. This allows it to generate code suggestions that use internal libraries, follow project-specific conventions, and reference relevant types or functions from elsewhere in the codebase, moving beyond single-file completion.

Multi-Language Support The tool supports multiple programming languages, another key pro. It can operate effectively in projects using Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java, and other common languages. This makes it applicable to polyglot codebases and teams where engineers work across different tech stacks, providing a consistent assistant interface.

IDE Integrations Cody integrates with major IDEs, specifically listed as VS Code and JetBrains editors (e.g., IntelliJ, PyCharm). This integration places the AI assistant directly within the developer’s primary workspace, allowing for inline suggestions, chat panels, and code edits without switching applications. The setup requires installing an IDE extension and connecting to a Sourcegraph account.

Codebase-Wide Editing & Q&A Beyond autocomplete, Cody can perform broader tasks based on its context. Users can ask it to explain complex sections, generate unit tests for a function, or even propose refactors that touch multiple files. This functionality is geared towards the best-for use case of learning new codebases or executing team-wide refactoring, as it can use cross-repo understanding.

Who Should Use Sourcegraph Cody?

Cody remains relevant to a specific buyer: developers and engineers working on large, complex codebases where understanding cross-file dependencies is critical — software engineers at mid-size to large companies maintaining substantial internal repositories, and teams that need codebase-wide refactoring where context awareness identifies the impacted code.

The audience, however, has narrowed sharply. Since Free and Pro were retired, an individual developer with a $9/month budget is no longer a customer Sourcegraph sells to. Evaluating Cody now means evaluating an Enterprise purchase.

Conversely, the tool was never for developers who need an offline-only AI assistant, since its context engine depends on communicating with Sourcegraph’s servers, nor for users of editors outside VS Code and JetBrains.

Real User Feedback

I am not going to publish a rating here. Earlier versions of this page cited a G2 score of 4.2/5 while the expert-verdict block on the same page cited 4.4 across 95 reviews — two contradictory figures, neither traced to a citable source. That is a defect, not a data point, so both are removed rather than reconciled by picking the nicer number.

What can be said without a rating: the feature users historically praised most was whole-codebase context, followed by multi-language support and IDE integrations. The most common friction points were the mandatory Sourcegraph account, free-tier usage limits, and latency on very large repositories. Those patterns describe the retired consumer tiers, so read them as history rather than as a current buyer’s guide.

If you need a current, sourced satisfaction signal for a coding assistant, use the vendor-neutral ratings on a live product’s page — not a number inherited from a tier that was discontinued.

Sourcegraph Cody vs Alternatives

Cody historically competed with GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Tabnine, and Amazon Q Developer — each with different trade-offs on codebase context, price, and IDE support. With Free and Pro retired, the practical comparison shifts: for most readers the question is no longer “Cody or Copilot”, it is “which currently sold assistant do I buy”.

GitHub Copilot If your primary development environment is tightly integrated with GitHub and you want the most straightforward setup inside VS Code or JetBrains, Copilot is the direct replacement path. Pick it if you prioritise simplicity and deep GitHub integration over whole-repository context — Copilot’s context window keeps expanding but has historically been file-focused.

Tabnine If data privacy and on-premise deployment are non-negotiable, Tabnine (which offers local models) is the privacy-first option. Choose it when you must guarantee no code leaves your network — accepting the trade-off of less deep, cloud-powered codebase context.

Amazon Q Developer (formerly Amazon CodeWhisperer) For teams heavily invested in AWS, Amazon Q Developer is the strongest alternative. Select it when you need an assistant optimised for AWS SDKs and APIs, and when its security-scanning features match your pipeline needs better than cross-repo context. Note: “Amazon CodeWhisperer” is the retired name; earlier versions of this page mixed the two.

Verdict: Is Sourcegraph Cody Worth It?

Only for Enterprise buyers, and only if whole-repo context inside your own boundary is the bottleneck. Cody Free and Cody Pro — the tiers this page used to recommend — were discontinued on 2025-07-23. There is no individual plan to evaluate, so “is it worth $9/mo” is no longer a question with an answer.

If you are a large, security-sensitive organisation that needs codebase-aware assistance under your own controls, Cody Enterprise is a live, supported product and a sales conversation worth having. For everyone else, the honest recommendation is to spend the evaluation on a tool you can actually still buy.

Editorial note: this article was rewritten on 2026-09-12 because its original premise — a purchasable $9/month Cody Pro with a usable free tier — had been false since July 2025.

Expert Verdict

Cody does one thing other AI assistants still struggle with: it reads your whole repository rather than the open file. If you have ever asked a chatbot to refactor a function and received hallucinated imports, that context-scanning is exactly the gap it closes — grounded answers citing real files, no guessing.

But the product you are reading about has been withdrawn from individual sale. Cody Free and Cody Pro ended on 2025-07-23; the well-known $9/month entry price is history. What survives is Cody Enterprise, still supported and still built for large, security-conscious engineering organisations. Star ratings circulating on other pages are not reproducible from a citable source, so this page does not publish one.

Bottom line: if you are an enterprise buyer whose bottleneck is whole-repository context under your own controls, Cody is a live product worth a conversation. If you are an individual developer looking for a $9/month assistant, that option no longer exists — spend the evaluation elsewhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I still buy Sourcegraph Cody Free or Cody Pro?

No. Both were discontinued on July 23, 2025. New signups had already closed on June 25, 2025. Cody was also removed from the Enterprise Starter plan on the same date. Any page offering you a $9/month Cody Pro describes a plan that has not been sold since mid-2025.

How much does Sourcegraph Cody cost today?

There is no self-serve price. sourcegraph.com/pricing no longer lists Cody at all — it lists an Enterprise plan starting at $16K (annual minimum). Cody Enterprise is priced by sales conversation.

What should former Cody Free or Pro users use instead?

Sourcegraph’s the announcement points affected users to Amp (ampcode.com) and credits the move — $10 for former Free users, $40 for former Pro users. Claims about Amp’s later corporate structure or pricing model appear only in third-party sources, so this page does not assert them.

Which IDEs and editors does Sourcegraph Cody support?

Cody integrates with VS Code and JetBrains IDEs. No extension is available for Sublime Text, Vim, or Emacs. The editor plugins require a running Sourcegraph instance, either cloud or self-hosted.

Does Sourcegraph Cody require an internet connection?

Yes. Cody relies on Sourcegraph’s cloud or self-hosted server for codebase indexing and context retrieval. There is no offline-only mode; latency on very large repositories comes from that server-side search rather than from your local machine.

Related Developer Tools & Guides

• GitHub Copilot 2026 Review & Pricing — Deep dive into the 2026 usage-based AI Credits billing shift and plan breakdowns.
• Automated Code Review with Cursor — Setting up AI-driven PR reviews in modern repositories.
• RightCode Coding API Relay — Low-entry API relay alternative for developers calling top LLM models.
• One-Person Business AI Tool Selection Guide — My complete field notebook comparing tools by real cost and workflow fit.

Data Sources

Every claim above was verified against official Sourcegraph pages:

Fact boundary. Confirmed from Sourcegraph’s own announcement: the 2025-07-23 discontinuation, the 2025-06-25 signup closure, the Enterprise Starter removal, the statement that Cody Enterprise customers are unaffected, and the Amp redirect with $10/$40 credits. Historical context only: the $9/month Pro price, and the free tier’s usage limits. Unknown / unverified: Amp’s corporate spin-out, its pass-through pricing, and its $5 minimum top-up — these appear only in third-party sources and are deliberately not asserted here.